Visualizzazione post con etichetta legal translation. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta legal translation. Mostra tutti i post

Legal Terminology or Jargon in Contracts

Nowadays more and more lawyers use plain English in contracts, although there are some who still insist on using legalese. At worst this can mean that some contracts are impossible for non-lawyers to read, and is not helped by the fact that the law uses a number of Latin terms. These two elements can make reading contracts a baffling experience for the rest of us! Below are some of the most commonly used legal words and phrases and their explanations:


Best Endeavours

Contracts will often bind one or more parties to using ‘reasonable’ or ‘best’ endeavours to do something. There is no solid definition as to what this actually means, and lawyers have argued whether there is in fact a distinction between ‘reasonable’ and ‘best’ in this context. Broadly speaking, however, it places a burden on a party to a contract to ‘try their best’, or do all that can reasonably be expected of them in the circumstances.


Bona Fide

Bona fide literally means ‘in good faith’. In the context of agreements, this is used to describe the intentions of the parties. In other words, a ‘bona fide agreement’ is one which is entered into honestly and without an intention to defraud. The opposite of ‘bona fide’ is ‘mala fides’ which means ‘in bad faith.’


Dissolution

This refers to the act of bringing an agreement to an end. If an agreement is dissolved, either between the parties or by a court, both parties will be restored to their original positions (as they were before they entered into the contract.) This term is also used in relation to marriages and corporate partnerships, amongst other things.


Force Majeure

This provides a ‘get out clause’ for parties to a contract in the event that an unforeseen event, that was not within their control, prevents them from carrying out their obligations under the contract.


Implied Terms

These are terms that form part of the contract even though they are not expressly included in the text of the contract. Perhaps the most common are those provided in contracts for the sale and/or supply of goods. As an example: if A sells merchandise to B, B would be entitled to assume that A had the legal right to sell him the merchandise – even though this right may not be explicitly spelt out on the contract.


Infringement

This relates to trademarks, which are a form of intellectual property. A trademark is infringed if an unauthorised person has used it, or a very similar trademark, for their own gain.


Inter alia

This is a latin term that means ‘amongst other things.’ For example, the judge went on to say, inter alia, that the contract was unenforceable.


Passing Off

This is a tort in common law that protects the rights of someone who has an unregistered trademark. For example, if Y misleads members of the public into thinking that they are dealing with X trader (when in fact it is Y) in order for Y to make a profit for themselves, X will sue under this tort.


Preamble

A preamble is found at the start of a commercial agreement. There should be no legally binding terms in this part of the contract. It is simply used to provide an introduction by way of background to the agreement, or the nature of the parties to the contract (e.g. X is a manufacturer of goods supplying to Y, a seller of goods.)


Privity Of Contract

This rule forbids third parties from being able to sue or be sued under a contract to which they are not a signatory. It means that only the parties to a contract can sue or be sued under it.


Recitals

The recitals are very similar to the preamble and are situated at the beginning of the contract. The recitals often start with the word ‘Whereas’ and are also known as the ‘whereas clauses.’ This part of the contract should not contain rights or obligations of the parties, but is merely there to explain or introduce the nature of or background to the contractual relationship.


Restrictive Covenant

A restrictive covenant is most often seen in contracts relating to land and employment contracts. In the case of land, it restricts the land from being used or developed in certain ways. In the case of employment contracts, it restricts an employee from doing certain things at the end of his or her employment. This may include not competing with their former employer, not dealing with former clients, not ‘poaching’ former colleagues and not using the former employer’s confidential information for any purpose.


Undertaking

An undertaking is a promise to do, or not to do, something. It is commonly used between lawyers to prove their good intentions. For example, if an original document needed to be served by 4pm, a solicitor could fax it and provide an undertaking that the original would be posted first class that evening.
_________________________________
http://www.contractsandagreements.co.uk/legal-terminology-jargon-contracts.html

Commission warns on new legal translation law

EU citizens who are arrested or accused of a crime have the right to interpretation in their own language in all courts in the union after a new directive came into force last week.
The deadline for EU member states to implement the law – the union’s first on rights of suspects in criminal procedures – passed last week. The new right applies throughout criminal proceedings, including when receiving legal advice.
The law was proposed by the European Commission in 2010 and adopted by theEuropean Parliament and Council of Ministers in a record time of just nine months.
“This can be an historic moment for justice in Europe: the first ever law on fair-trial rights for citizens will become a concrete reality if member states live up to their legal obligations,” said Viviane Reding, the EU’s Justice Commissioner.
She added that the Commission would “not shy away from naming and shaming” states that did not implement the new directive, which she said went to the heart of citizens’ rights.
The directive guarantees the right of EU citizens to be interviewed, to take part in hearings and to receive legal advice in their own language during any part of a criminal proceeding, in all courts in the union. It was introduced in order to ensure full compliance with the standards provided by the European Convention on Human Rights and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, as well as with the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Translation and interpretation costs will have to be met by the member state, not by the suspect.
In a statement announcing the passing of the implementation deadline, the Commission said that without minimum standards to ensure fair proceedings, judicial authorities would be reluctant to send someone to face trial in another country. As a result, EU measures to fight crime, such as the European arrest warrant, would not be fully applied.
It said the right to translation and interpretation was the first in a series of fair trial measures to set common EU standards in criminal cases. The law was followed by a second directive on the right to information in criminal proceedings, adopted in 2012, and the right to access to a lawyer, adopted earlier this year.
Meanwhile, the Law Society has urged the Government to move quickly to establish the new Court of Appeal without “stinting on resources”. The new court will sit between theHigh Court and the Supreme Court, and is aimed at reducing delays at the latter court.
The path was cleared for the new institution to be set up when the proposal was comfortably passed with a majority of 65 per cent in a referendum last month.
Referring to the referendum outcome, Law Society director general Ken Murphy said: “There is nothing for which the Government has a stronger, clearer, more direct mandate from the people of Ireland than this. It must proceed immediately to put in place a Court of Appeal as a new and necessary piece of infrastructure in our justice system.” Mr Murphy said this should happen without delay “and without stinting on the resources necessary to make it effective”.
Minister for Justice Alan Shatter, who led the campaign for a Yes vote in the referendum, has said he hopes the new court will begin hearing appeals next autumn.
It is expected that 10 new judges will be appointed to the court, which will hear both civil and criminal appeals and leave the Supreme Court free to focus on cases of major significance. It will cost an estimated €2.5-€3 million per year, according to the Department of Justice.
The salary and other conditions for judges in the new court have not yet been announced, but pay is expected to be set between that of a High Court judge (€172,710) and a member of the Supreme Court (€182,895).