Visualizzazione post con etichetta teacher. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta teacher. Mostra tutti i post

Slang dictionary created to help teachers combat bullying

If a student types “gnoc” into their computer, should you be worried? If they tap out “dirl”, should they be disciplined? Should the use of skincare product Bio-Oil concern you?
Teachers who are unsure of the answers might want to turn to a new “urban dictionary” of slang that will help them to crack down on bullying and other inappropriate online behaviour.
The dictionary is part of a computer program that scans online activity in schools for words or acronyms deemed offensive or damaging to students, and then sends a report to teachers.

It is the brainchild of software company Impero, which has worked closely with the Anti-Bullying Alliance, eating disorder charity B-eat, students and teachers to compile a glossary of terms that will trigger an alert.
The dictionary is split into nine sections dealing with issues such as sexting, suicide, grooming, self-harm, adult content, eating disorders, bullying and trolling, and racist and homophobic language.
Terms include “gnoc”, which stands for “get naked on camera”; “dirl”, an acronym often used in online bullying that means “die in real life”; and even the name of well-known product Bio-Oil, which is often used by people who self-harm to reduce the appearance of scars. 

Jonathan Valentine, who developed the program, said it was increasingly difficult for staff to keep up with slang used by young people online. “We originally developed the software to deal with misbehaviour, but we decided to focus on e-safety and came up with the idea of a dictionary of certain words and phrases,” he said. 

“We usually leave it to schools to create their own list of words, but we decided to create our own by going into schools and speaking to students directly. The list can be used by any school across the country, but can also be added to if necessary. And we’ve been told that it has already alerted school staff to a potential suicide.” 

The software is being used in nearly 1,400 secondary schools in the UK, and an earlier version of it has been deployed in schools in the US, where it is being used to tackle gang-related activities.

The Anti-Bullying Alliance urged schools not to use the software as a surveillance tool, adding that the dictionary could give teachers a greater understanding of youth culture.

“When it comes to cyberbullying, it is really important teachers are given as many tools as possible, and what the dictionary has succeeded in doing is often showing the disconnect between teachers and their students,” said Luke Roberts, national coordinator of the Anti-Bullying Alliance. 

“What it also showed were areas where teachers will need to try to keep up to date with the changes in language. Certain words are the same all over [the UK], but what was revealing were the different terms used in racist language, particularly when it came to Islamophobia.”

Mr Roberts said that children of Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi backgrounds were being subjected to taunts of “terrorist”. 

Students and teachers at Laurence Jackson School in Cleveland, England, helped Impero to develop the dictionary, and the school said that it had been very effective in preventing abusive behaviour. 

“It’s a very comprehensive list of words,” said Mary King, a member of the school’s senior leadership team. “We were able to contribute our own words to take into account regional variations, because a swear word in the North East [of England] may be different elsewhere.” 

Ms King said that students often made comments online that they would never make face to face, and added that her school’s dictionaries would need to be reviewed regularly to ensure they were up to date. 

“At the moment the dictionaries are very current, but we will have to review and update them at least annually to keep up with the different phrases our students use,” she said.

_____________________________
http://news.tes.co.uk/b/news/2014/01/23/slang-dictionary-created-to-combat-bullying.aspx

Speaking with one voice on languages

Why do we have such a problem with modern languages?


Next month the Long Room at Trinity College Dublin will be home to a Babel of tongues as the many language-interest groups in Ireland come together to form a new advocacy movement for language learning.
Ireland is well behind other nations when it comes to languages, and we have no official language policy, beyond Irish, around which a movement for progress could coalesce. Modern languages are not compulsory at any stage of Irish schooling. Last year’s budget saw the abolition of the Modern Languages in Primary Schools Initiative (MLPSI); our first foray into early-language learning never made it past the pilot stage. Hence the One Voice for Languages movement.
“We have seen what can happen when there is State support for a subject,” says Kristin Brogan, a founder of One Voice and a lecturer in German, intercultural communication and EU projects at the Institute of Technology Tralee. “There has been a huge emphasis on science and technology over the past few years, and it has paid off in terms of uptake at postprimary and third level.”
Brogan and the One Voice group want to light a similar fire under language learning, but, she admits, there are obstacles unique to Ireland. “There is a tendency to assume English is enough, that we don’t need other languages. However, in Europe, the English language is like the European Computer Driving Licence. Everyone has it. Irish people competing for jobs in Europe are up against applicants with English, their own native language and often a third language as well.”
The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment is moving towards an integrated language curriculum at primary level, but the focus will be on English and Irish, with some element of language-skill learning. This, the NCCA hopes, will “establish a sound foundation for the learning of a foreign language in postprimary school. An integrated language curriculum would enable teachers to achieve learning efficiencies by explicitly drawing children’s attention to similarities and differences between their languages”.
But any hope that French, Spanish or German might find its way back into primary schools, where children are at the optimum age for new language acquisition, has been definitively extinguished.
“The decision to end the MLPSI was made in the context of a very challenging budgetary environment, where difficult decisions had to be taken,” a spokesperson for the Department of Education told the Irish Times. “The programme ended in June 2012, and there are no plans to revisit this decision.”


Irish-language lobby
Irish is the second challenge to modern-language learning in Ireland. Irish-language groups will form part of One Voice, but the native tongue occupies a unique position that sets it apart from other languages in the Irish context. “We don’t want to put down Irish,” says Brogan. “It’s a can of worms nobody wants to open.”